To prepare for this Discussion:

  • By Day 5 of Week 5, your Instructor will have assigned      you an anxiety disorder, which will be your focus for your initial post      for this Discussion.

Assigned Disorder:  SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER (SOCIAL PHOBIA)

Post:

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now
  • Explain the difference between an adjustment disorder      and anxiety disorder.
  • Provide examples to illustrate your rationale.
  • Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned anxiety disorder.
  • Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned anxiety disorder.

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years old in APA format, including introduction and conclusion 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

* Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

* Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

* Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addresed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

* Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references

Name: NRNP_6670_Week6_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

 

 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 2/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

4 (4%) – 5 (5%) *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

First Reponse Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

 

 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 3/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

First Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

First Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

 

 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 4/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Second Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6670_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.