To prepare for this Discussion:

  • By Day 5 of Week 5, your Instructor will have assigned      you an anxiety disorder, which will be your focus for your initial post      for this Discussion.

Assigned Disorder:  SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER (SOCIAL PHOBIA)

Post:

  • Explain the difference between an adjustment disorder      and anxiety disorder.
  • Provide examples to illustrate your rationale.
  • Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned anxiety disorder.
  • Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned anxiety disorder.

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years old in APA format, including introduction and conclusion 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

* Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

* Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

* Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addresed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

* Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references

Name: NRNP_6670_Week6_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

 

 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 2/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

4 (4%) – 5 (5%) *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

First Reponse Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

 

 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 3/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

First Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

First Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

 

 

12/28/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033599_1 4/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Second Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6670_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.