I need 200-250 word for both question in APA format. Please be clear and concise.
1. Why would a village risk extermination for the sake of a wounded visitor (Luttrell) to their village? Can such civility exist in a war zone?
use the link for more information: https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-afghan-village-t…
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now2.This week we have narrative from different SEAL operations to weave a thread together about ethics under fire.
The first scenario was Bob Kerrey (Vietnam) and the alleged killing of civilians to cover an operation and his team.The second scenario is Lt. Mike Murphy, Marus Luttrell, “Axe” Axelson and Danny Dietz, who declined to kill 3 goatherds to secure there clandestine operating post. Kerry experienced no loss of personnel, Murphy lost everyone except Luttrell.
The Choice of Evils Doctrine generally provides justification for a person to commit a bad act when he/she is confronted with a choice of two evils, as long as the lesser of the two evils is selected as the course of action. As we have read, two U.S. Navy SEAL teams were presented with the choice of killing civilians or experiencing mission failure. The result of these decisions had hard consequences.
Ethically, who comes out on top? Remember the times and examine the very different rules of engagement of the 2 time periods. Discuss the legal and the ethical components of these decisions and state what course of action you would have taken, as team leader, in each scenario and why. Think through the totality of the circumstances before you start throwing down your ideas.
https://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/25/nyregion/bob-ke… (Bob Kerrey)
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/movies/navy-… (LT mike)